🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime genre has a new medium, or perhaps even a completely fresh vocabulary and grammar: police body cam footage. Countenances of those harmed, observers and possible perpetrators loom up to the cameras, sometimes in the intense brightness of headlights or flashlights as the officers approach, their expressions and tones eloquent of caution or fear or anger or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we often catch sight of the faces of the officers themselves, one waiting impassively while the other conducts the inquiry with what occasionally seems like extraordinary diffidence – though maybe this is because they know they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Non-Fiction Cinema

We have already had the Netflix real-life crime film American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the killing of an social media personality by her boyfriend, whose primary focus was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the police seemed extraordinarily lax with the suspect. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, composed entirely of officer footage. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the tragic incident of a Florida mother in Ocala, Florida, a African American woman whose children reportedly bothered and antagonized her neighbor, a local resident. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the authorities were repeatedly called, Lorincz fatally shot Owens through her locked door, when Owens went to the neighbor's residence to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Police Inquiry and State Laws

The investigating authorities found proof that Lorincz had done online research into Florida’s “stand your ground” laws, which allow householders and others to use firearms if there is a reasonable belief of danger. The documentary builds its story with the body cam footage generated during the multiple officer calls to the location before the shooting, and then at the horrific and chaotic incident site itself – prefaced by 911 audio material of the caller calling the police in a dramatically trembling voice. There is also jail video of the individual which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Portrayal of the Accused

The film does not really imply anything too complicated about Lorincz, or any mitigating factors. She is obviously disturbed, although the children are heard calling her “the Karen”, an ugly jibe. The film is presented as an example of how self-defense regulations lead to senseless and tragic bloodshed. But the reality of firearm possession and the second amendment (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a deceased pundit famously claimed made firearm fatalities a necessary cost) is not much highlighted.

Police Interrogation and Gun Culture

It is possible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel surprised at how little interest the police took in this aspect. When did she buy her gun? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? How was the gun kept in her home? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they could have inquired in recordings that were not included). Or is possessing a firearm so commonplace it would be like asking about microwaves or bread heaters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what appeared to her local residents a very long time, Lorincz was not even arrested and charged, only detained and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another point of comparison, by the way, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was ultimately officially taken into custody in the detention area, there is an extraordinary sequence in which the individual simply refuses to stand, will not extend her arms for the cuffs, not aggressively, but with the politely self-pitying air of someone whose psychological state means that she just can’t do it. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point encouraged her to think that this might actually work?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is saved for the closing credits. A very sombre portrayal of American crime and punishment.