🔗 Share this article

The US Justice Department has made another attempt to obtain access to grand jury materials from the probe into the late financier, which resulted in his criminal charges in 2019.

Legislative Action Spurs Renewed Legal Effort

The recently filed petition, signed by the US attorney for the southern district, declares that Congress made it apparent when approving the release of probe records that these legal files should be unsealed.

"The legislative move superseded current regulations in a manner that allows the unsealing of the grand jury records," noted the justice department.

Schedule Factors

The petition asked the district court to act promptly in making public the documents, noting the 30-day window created after the measure was enacted last week.

Earlier Petition Encountered Rejection

However, this new attempt comes after a prior request from the former administration was turned down by Judge Richard Berman, who pointed to a "substantial and convincing justification" for maintaining the documents confidential.

In his recent judgment, the judge commented that the seventy pages of grand jury transcripts and supporting materials, featuring a slide deck, communication logs, and correspondence from victims and their lawyers, are minimal compared to the authorities' extensive repository of case-related files.

"The authorities' 100,000 pages of Epstein files overshadow the limited grand jury materials," noted the magistrate in his judgment, stating that the motion appeared to be a "diversion" from releasing records already in the authorities' custody.

Nature of the Federal Jury Records

The sealed records primarily consist of the account of an FBI agent, who served as the lone witness in the grand jury proceedings and reportedly had "limited personal awareness of the case details" with testimony that was "primarily secondhand."

Safety Considerations

Judge Berman pointed to the "conceivable risks to survivors' security and personal information" as the compelling reason for preserving the documents restricted.

Parallel Legal Matter

A parallel motion to release federal jury statements concerning the prosecution of his accomplice was also denied, with the presiding judge observing that the federal petition incorrectly implied the sealed records contained an "unexplored treasure trove of unrevealed details" about the proceedings.

Recent Developments

The renewed request comes following closely the designation of a new prosecutor to investigate the financier's connections with well-known politicians and several months after the firing of one of the main lawyers working on the proceedings.

When inquired about how the active inquiry might affect the disclosure of related documents in government possession, the chief law enforcement officer commented: "We cannot comment on that because it is now a ongoing inquiry in the Manhattan jurisdiction."